Financial
speculators are nervously asking whether Greece will pay its debt or default.
Political leaders from Europe to the US and the IMF are telling the Greek
government to leave aside its democratic mandate and accept further austerity
as a condition for getting credit to continue to pay back its debt. But the
right question politically is: should Greece pay this debt? Özlem Onaran
explores the issues.
The
creditor institutions as well as the debtor governments have an obligation to
audit these aspects before any loan agreement is made. Did EU governments
consider whether any of these loan agreements violated the EU Charter of
Fundamental Rights?
In the case
of Greece, the ILO’s supervisory body along with other supervisory bodies of
the European Code of Social Security, the United Nations and European human
rights bodies have repeatedly expressed concern that maintaining the course of
fiscal consolidation foreseen by the MoU undermined the national social
security system’s “capacity to maintain the population ‘in health and decency’
above the poverty threshold.” As a result of these policies and the dismantling
of the collective bargaining system, real hourly wages in Greece fell by 25% by
2014. The minimum wage has fallen to its level of the 1970s. The minimum
pension fell below the poverty threshold. As many as 35.7% of the population
and 44.1% of children aged 11 to 15 are at risk of poverty or social exclusion.
The economic depression became a fully-fledged reproductive crisis, with the
population decreasing at the same time as rising emigration and decreasing fertility.
The
conditionalities of the loan agreements since 2010 have not only destabilized
the economy and society, but they also made public debt even more
unsustainable. Research by Gechert and Rannenberg of the Hans Böckler
Foundation in Germany show that without austerity the Greek economy would only
have stagnated rather than lose 25% of its GDP. Implementing tax increases
alone and no spending cuts would have been much more effective in lowering the
debt to GDP ratio. The Troika did not adequately take into account the higher
than average multiplier effects of cuts during recessions when designing the
Greek programme.
Our work at
Greenwich for the Foundation for European Progressive Studies shows that the
fall in wages alone explains 4.5 percentage points of the decline in Greek GDP.
Contrary to the assumptions of the European Commission (EC) and the IMF,
falling wages do not stimulate net exports significantly either.
Dealing
with the depression and humanitarian crisis in Greece requires measures to
reverse both inequality and austerity, increase the minimum wage, re-establish
collective bargaining institutions and the welfare state, and promote public
investment in the social and physical infrastructure via a healthy and
progressive tax system. This is, unfortunately, not how the creditor
institutions understand structural change.
Mario
Draghi, the ECB President, has recently warned; “we are certainly entering into
uncharted waters if the crisis were to precipitate.” To avoid the next
potential Lehman moment, the sane response to the crisis would be to analyse
the origins of the debt in Europe to shed light on adequate policies to
generate sustainable development and social cohesion in Europe. The German
export-led growth model also requires debt, but in another country, in Greece
or Spain, hence it is as unsustainable as debt-led growth. However the EC, ECB,
and the IMF are not guided by rational long-term economic and social concerns,
but by erroneous economic concepts that serve the interests of the financial
world. Therefore, the initiative of the Greek Parliament is of historical
importance, not just for Greece but also for Europe as a whole.
(Πηγή:
socialistresistance.org)
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου