Since
Alexis Tsipras persuaded Greek voters to endorse a third bailout programme,
after flirting last summer with sovereign default, eurozone creditors have been
keen to view him as a responsible partner. The row over a leaked conversation
between International Monetary Fund officials suggests they are wrong.
If it is true that the Greek government has
engineered the crisis in an attempt to eject the IMF from bailout talks, then
its tactics are irresponsible. Whatever the source of the leak, it is clear
that Mr Tsipras wants the IMF to leave. Once again, he is displaying an
instinct for short-term political gain and a disregard for his country’s
long-term interests.
The ever-unpopular IMF is an easy target for
a prime minister facing criticism for his handling of the economy and the
refugee crisis, and under pressure from the resurgent opposition headed by
Kyriakos Mitsotakis. It is also true that the fund would be a tougher judge of
Greece’s fiscal and economic performance.
At present, Brussels insists that Greece has
done nearly enough to complete the first review of its €86bn bailout - a
necessary step before any further discussion of debt relief. The IMF has not
yet agreed to join the rescue effort, because it believes the reforms agreed so
far will not achieve the programme’s targets.
Mr Tsipras would prefer to agree a path to
debt relief without the IMF’s stricter conditions and monitoring. But this is
an unrealistic goal. European creditors might demand less of Greece in the
content of structural reforms. But they insist on targeting a primary surplus
of 3.5 per cent of GDP that Greece is unlikely to meet under its current
policies. Moreover, Germany has ruled out full-scale debt writedowns and is
unlikely to agree to it without IMF involvement.
The leaked conversation does not betray any
conspiracy to force Greece into greater austerity. Poul Thomsen, head of the
IMF’s European bureau, has already argued on his public blog that the current
programme does not add up; that the IMF could accept less stringent reforms if
accompanied by appropriate debt relief; and that both Greece and European
creditors must stop delaying difficult decisions.
This scenario is all too plausible. The EU’s
negotiations with Greece over the past six years could be described as a
strategy of “extend and pretend”, at every stage leaving unsolved problems to
be dealt with at the next crisis. The IMF may not have an easy solution to
Greece’s ills, but it is at least insisting on honesty, and it is the only
organisation concerned with the long-term structural reforms needed for the
country to prosper within the eurozone.
Πηγή: Financial Times
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου